The Plan to invade Japan

This is long but, for those of you who have heard from groups such as the Physicians for Social Responsibility and other bleeding-heart organizations and individuals, read this and see what America would have had to face to invade Japan instead of dropping the Atomic Bombs on them. Most of us wouldn’t have had many relatives that were in World War Two that would have survived the battles that would have been fought to finally conquer Japan. It is an actual tell all of the battle plans that were drawn up. Thanks to my friend and fellow author TJ Reeder for sending it to me. For all of you Marines out there, the Marine Corps would have been eradicated down to the last man. It was a battle that would have killed millions once set into play. The bombs stopped all that insanity and stopped the Kamikaze swarms in their tracks. I cannot remember the officer’s name who wrote this, but it is an incredible account of what ‘Might have been’.

Semper Fi and God Bless America,

L Michael

Subject: Declassified Plans for WWII Invasion of Japan….—

Deep in the recesses of the National Archives in Washington, D.C., hidden

for nearly four decades lie thousands of pages of yellowing and dusty

documents stamped “Top Secret”. These documents, now declassified, are the

plans for Operation Downfall, the invasion of Japan during World War II.

Only a few Americans in 1945 were aware of the elaborate plans that had been

prepared for the Allied Invasion of the Japanese home islands.

Even fewer today are aware of the defenses the Japanese had prepared to

counter the invasion had it been launched. Operation Downfall was finalized

during the spring and summer of 1945. It called for two massive military

undertakings to be carried out in succession and aimed at the heart of the

Japanese Empire.

In the first invasion – code named “Operation Olympic”- American combat

troops would land in Japan by amphibious assault during the early morning

hours of November 1, 1945 – 61 years ago. Fourteen combat divisions of

soldiers and Marines would land on heavily fortified and defended Kyushu,

the southernmost of the Japanese home islands, after an unprecedented naval

and aerial bombardment.

The second invasion on March 1, 1946 – code named “Operation Coronet”- would

send at least 22 divisions against 1 million Japanese defenders on the main

island of Honshu and the Tokyo Plain. Its goal: the unconditional surrender

of Japan.

With the exception of a part of the British Pacific Fleet, Operation

Downfall was to be a strictly American operation. It called for using the

entire Marine Corps, the entire Pacific Navy, elements of the 7th Army Air

Force, the 8 Air Force (recently redeployed from Europe), 10th Air Force and

the American Far Eastern Air Force. More than 1.5 million combat soldiers

with 3 million more in support or more than 40% of all servicemen still in

uniform in 1945 – would be directly involved in the two amphibious assaults.

Casualties were expected to be extremely heavy. Admiral William Leahy

estimated that there would be more than 250,000 Americans killed or wounded

on Kyushu alone. General Charles Willoughby, chief of intelligence for

General Douglas MacArthur, the Supreme Commander of the Southwest Pacific,

estimated American casualties would be one million men by the fall of 1946.

Willoughby’s own intelligence staff considered this to be a conservative

estimate.

During the summer of 1945, America had little time to prepare for such an

endeavor, but top military leaders were in almost unanimous agreement that

an invasion was necessary.

While naval blockade and strategic bombing of Japan was considered to be

useful, General MacArthur, for instance, did not believe a blockade would

bring about an unconditional surrender. The advocates for invasion agreed

that while a naval blockade chokes, it does not kill; and though strategic

bombing might destroy cities; it leaves whole armies intact.

So, on May 25, 1945, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, after extensive deliberation,

issued to General MacArthur, Admiral Chester Nimitz, and Army Air Force

General Henry Arnold, the top-secret directive to proceed with the invasion

of Kyushu. The target date was after the typhoon season.

President Truman approved the plans for the invasions July 24. Two days

later, the United Nations issued the Potsdam Proclamation, which called upon

Japan to surrender unconditionally or face total destruction. Three days

later, the Japanese governmental news agency broadcast to the world that

Japan would ignore the proclamation and would refuse to surrender. During

this same period it was learned — via monitoring Japanese radio broadcasts

— that Japan had closed all schools and mobilized its school children, was

arming its civilian population and was fortifying caves and building

underground defenses.

Operation Olympic called for a four-pronged assault on Kyushu. Its purpose

was to seize and control the southern one-third of that island and establish

naval and air bases, to tighten the naval blockade of the home islands, to

destroy units of the main Japanese army and to support the later invasion of

the Tokyo Plain.

The preliminary invasion would begin October 27 when the 40th Infantry

Division would land on a series of small islands west and southwest of

Kyushu. At the same time, the 158th Regimental Combat Team would invade and

occupy a small island 28 miles south of Kyushu. On these islands, seaplane

bases would be established, and radar would be set up to provide advance air

warning for the invasion fleet, to serve as fighter direction centers for

the carrier-based aircraft and to provide an emergency anchorage for the

invasion fleet should things not go well on the day of the invasion. As

the invasion grew imminent, the massive firepower of the Navy – the Third

and Fifth Fleets — would approach Japan. The Third Fleet, under Admiral

William “Bull” Halsey, with its big guns and naval aircraft, would provide

strategic support for the operation against Honshu and Hokkaido.

Halsey’s fleet would be composed of battleships, heavy cruisers, destroyers,

dozens of support ships and three fast carrier task groups. From these

carriers, hundreds of Navy fighters, dive bombers and torpedo planes would

hit targets all over the island of Honshu. The 3,000 ship Fifth Fleet, under

Admiral Raymond Spruance would carry the invasion troops. Several days

before the invasion, the battleships, heavy cruisers and destroyers would

pour thousands of tons of high explosives into the target areas. They would

not cease the bombardment until after the land forces had been launched.

During the early morning hours of November 1, the invasion would begin.

Thousands of soldiers and Marines would pour ashore on beaches all along the

eastern, southeastern, southern and western coasts of Kyushu.

Waves of Helldivers, Dauntless dive bombers, Avengers, Corsairs, and Hellcats from 66 aircraft carriers would bomb, rocket and strafe enemy defenses, gun

emplacements and troop concentrations along the beaches.

The Eastern Assault Force consisting of the 25th, 33rd, and 41st Infantry

Divisions, would land near Miyaski, at beaches called Austin, Buick,

Cadillac, Chevrolet, Chrysler, and Ford, and move inland to attempt to

capture the city and its nearby airfield. The Southern Assault Force,

consisting of the 1st Cavalry Division, the 43rd Division and Americal

Division would land inside Ariake Bay at beaches labeled DeSoto, Dusenberg,

Essex, Ford, and Franklin and attempt to capture Shibushi and the city of

Kanoya and its airfield.

On the western shore of Kyushu, at beaches Pontiac, Reo, Rolls Royce, Saxon,

Star, Studebaker, Stutz, Winston and Zephyr, the V Amphibious Corps would

land the 2nd, 3rd, and 5th Marine Divisions, sending half of its force

inland to Sendai and the other half to the port city of Kagoshima. On

November 4, the Reserve Force, consisting of the 81st and 98th Infantry

Divisions and the 11th Airborne Division, after feigning an attack on the

island of Shikoku, would be landed — if not needed elsewhere – near

Kaimondake, near the southernmost tip of Kagoshima Bay, at the beaches

designated Locomobile, Lincoln, LaSalle, Hupmobile, Moon, Mercedes, Maxwell,

Overland, Oldsmobile, Packard, and Plymouth.

Olympic was not just a plan for invasion, but for conquest and occupation as well. It was expected to take four months to achieve its objective, with the three fresh American divisions per month to be landed in support of that operation if needed. If all went well with Olympic; Coronet would be launched March 1, 1946. Coronet

would be twice the size of Olympic, with as many as 28 divisions landing on

Honshu. All along the coast east of Tokyo, the American 1st Army would

land the 5th, 7th, 27th, 44th, 86th, and 96th Infantry Divisions, along with

the 4th and 6th Marine Divisions.

At Sagami Bay, just south of Tokyo, the entire 8th and 10th Armies would strike north and east to clear the long western shore of Tokyo Bay and attempt to go as far as Yokohama. The assault troops landing south of Tokyo would be the 4th, 6th, 8th, 24th, 31st, 37th, 38th, and 8th Infantry Divisions, along with the 13th and 20th Armored Divisions.

Following the initial assault, eight more divisions – the 2nd, 28th, 35th,

91st, 95th, 97th, and 104th Infantry Divisions and the 11th Airborne

Division — would be landed. If additional troops were needed, as expected,

other divisions redeployed from Europe and undergoing training in the United

States would be shipped to Japan in what was hoped to be the final push.

Captured Japanese documents and post war interrogations of Japanese military

leaders disclose that information concerning the number of Japanese planes

available for the defense of the home islands was dangerously in error.

During the sea battle at Okinawa alone, Japanese Kamikaze aircraft sank 32

Allied ships and damaged more than 400 others. But during the summer of

1945, American top brass concluded that the Japanese had spent their air

force since American bombers and fighters daily flew unmolested over Japan.

What the military leaders did not know was that by the end of July the

Japanese had been saving all aircraft, fuel, and pilots in reserve, and had

been feverishly building new planes for the decisive battle for their

homeland.

As part of Ketsu -Go, the name for the plan to defend Japan — the Japanese

Were building 20 suicide takeoff strips in southern Kyushu with underground

hangars. They also had 35 camouflaged airfields and nine seaplane bases.

On the night before the expected invasion, 50 Japanese seaplane bombers, 100

former carrier aircraft and 50 land-based army planes were to be launched in

a suicide attack on the fleet.

The Japanese had 58 more airfields in Korea, western Honshu and Shikoku,

which also were to be used for massive suicide attacks.

Allied intelligence had established that the Japanese had no more than 2,500

aircraft of which they guessed 300 would be deployed in suicide attacks. In

August 1945, however, unknown to Allied intelligence, the Japanese still had

5,651 army and 7,074 navy aircraft, for a total of 12,725 planes of all

types.

Every village had some type of aircraft manufacturing activity hidden

in mines, railway tunnels, under viaducts and in basements of department

stores, work was being done to construct new planes. Additionally, the

Japanese were building newer and more effective models of the Okka, a

rocket-propelled bomb much like the German V-1, but flown by a suicide

pilot.

When the invasion became imminent, Ketsu-Go called for a fourfold aerial

plan of attack to destroy up to 800 Allied ships.

While Allied ships were approaching Japan, but still in the open seas, an

initial force of 2,000 army and navy fighters were to fight to the death to

control the skies over Kyushu. A second force of 330 navy combat pilots was

to attack the main body of the task force to keep it from using its fire

support and air cover to protect the troop-carrying transports. While these

two forces were engaged, a third force of 825 suicide planes was to hit the

American transports.

As the invasion convoys approached their anchorages, another 2,000 suicide

planes were to be launched in waves of 200 to 300, to be used in hour by

hour attacks.

By mid-morning of the first day of the invasion, most of the American

land-based aircraft would be forced to return to their bases, leaving the

defense against the suicide planes to the carrier pilots and the shipboard

gunners.

Carrier pilots crippled by fatigue would have to land time and time again to

rearm and refuel. Guns would malfunction from the heat of continuous firing

and ammunition would become scarce.

Gun crews would be exhausted by nightfall, but still the waves of kamikaze would continue with the fleet hovering off the beaches, all remaining Japanese aircraft would be committed to nonstop suicide attacks, which the Japanese hoped could be sustained for 10 days. The Japanese planned to coordinate their air strikes with attacks from the 40 re maiming submarines from the Imperial Navy – some armed with Long Lance torpedoes with a range of 20 miles — when the invasion fleet was

180 miles off Kyushu.

The Imperial Navy had 23 destroyers and two cruisers which were

operational. These ships were to be used to counterattack the American

invasion. A number of the destroyers were to be beached at the last minute to

be used as anti-invasion gun platforms.

Once offshore, the invasion fleet would be forced to defend not only against

the attacks from the air, but would also be confronted with suicide attacks

from sea. Japan had established a suicide naval attack unit of midget

submarines, human torpedoes and exploding motorboats.

The goal of the Japanese was to shatter the invasion before the landing.

The Japanese were convinced the Americans would back off or become so

demoralized that they would then accept a less-than-unconditional surrender

and a more honorable and face-saving end for the Japanese.

But as horrible as the battle of Japan would be off the beaches, it would be

on Japanese soil that the American forces would face the most rugged and

fanatical defense encountered during the war.

Throughout the island-hopping Pacific campaign, Allied troops had always out

numbered the Japanese by 2 to 1 and sometimes 3 to 1. In Japan it would be

different. By virtue of a combination of cunning, guesswork, and brilliant

military reasoning, a number of Japan’s top military leaders were able to

deduce, not only when, but where, the United States would land its first

invasion forces.

Facing the 14 American divisions landing at Kyushu would be 14 Japanese

divisions, 7 independent mixed brigades, 3 tank brigades and thousands of

naval troops. On Kyushu the odds would be 3 to 2 in favor of the Japanese,

with 790,000 enemy defenders against 550,000 Americans. This time the bulk

of the Japanese defenders would not be the poorly trained and ill-equipped

labor battalions that the Americans had faced in the earlier campaigns.

The Japanese defenders would be the hard core of the home army. These

troops were well-fed and well equipped. They were familiar with the

terrain, had stockpiles of arms and ammunition, and had developed an

effective system of transportation and supply almost invisible from the air.

Many of these Japanese troops were the elite of the army, and they were

swollen with a fanatical fighting spirit.

Japan’s network of beach defenses consisted of offshore mines, thousands of

suicide scuba divers attacking landing craft, and mines planted on the

beaches. Coming ashore, the American Eastern amphibious assault forces at

Miyazaki would face three Japanese divisions, and two others poised for

counterattack. Awaiting the Southeastern attack force at Ariake Bay was an

entire division and at least one mixed infantry brigade.

On the western shores of Kyushu, the Marines would face the most brutal

opposition. Along the invasion beaches would be the three Japanese

divisions, a tank brigade, a mixed infantry brigade and an artillery

command. Components of two divisions would also be poised to launch

counterattacks.

If not needed to reinforce the primary landing beaches, the American Reserve

Force would be landed at the base of Kagoshima Bay November 4, where they

would be confronted by two mixed infantry brigades, parts of two infantry

divisions and thousands of naval troops.

All along the invasion beaches, American troops would face coastal

batteries, anti-landing obstacles and a network of heavily fortified

pillboxes, bunkers, and underground fortresses.

As Americans waded ashore, they would face intense artillery and mortar fire as they worked their way through concrete rubble and barbed-wire entanglements arranged to funnel them into the muzzles of these Japanese guns.

On the beaches and beyond would-be hundreds of Japanese machine gun

positions, beach mines, booby traps, trip-wire mines and sniper units.

Suicide units concealed in “spider holes” would engage the troops as they

passed nearby. In the heat of battle, Japanese infiltration units would be

sent to reap havoc in the American lines by cutting phone and communication

lines. Some of the Japanese troops would be in American uniform.

English-speaking Japanese officers were assigned to break in on American

radio traffic to call off artillery fire, to order retreats and to further

confuse troops. Other infiltration with demolition charges strapped on their

chests or backs would attempt to blow up American tanks, artillery pieces

and ammunition stores as they were unloaded ashore.

Beyond the beaches were large artillery pieces situated to bring down a

curtain of fire on the beach. Some of these large guns were mounted on

railroad tracks running in and out of caves protected by concrete and steel.

The battle for Japan would be won by what Simon Bolivar Buckner, a

lieutenant general in the Confederate army during the Civil War, had called

“Prairie Dog Warfare.” This type of fighting was almost unknown to the

ground troops in Europe and the Mediterranean. It was peculiar only to the

soldiers and Marines who fought the Japanese on islands all over the Pacific

— at Tarawa, Saipan, Iwo Jima and Okinawa.

Prairie Dog Warfare was a battle for yards, feet and sometimes inches. It

was brutal, deadly and dangerous form of combat aimed at an underground,

heavily fortified, non-retreating enemy. In the mountains behind the

Japanese beaches were underground networks of caves, bunkers, command posts

and hospitals connected by miles of tunnels with dozens of entrances and

exits. Some of these complexes could hold up to 1,000 troops.

In addition to the use of poison gas and bacteriological warfare (which the

Japanese had experimented with), Japan mobilized its citizenry.

Had Olympic come about, the Japanese civilian population, inflamed by a

national slogan – “One Hundred Million Will Die for the Emperor and Nation”

– were prepared to fight to the death Twenty-Eight Million Japanese had

become a part of the National Volunteer Combat Force. They were armed with

ancient rifles, lunge mines, satchel charges, Molotov cocktails and one-shot

black powder mortars. Others were armed with swords, long bows, axes and

bamboo spears. The civilian units were to be used in nighttime attacks, hit

and run maneuvers, delaying actions and massive suicide charges at the

weaker American positions.

At the early stage of the invasion, 1,000 Japanese and American soldiers

would be dying every hour.

The invasion of Japan never became a reality because on August 6, 1945, an

atomic bomb was exploded over Hiroshima. Three days later, a second bomb was

dropped on Nagasaki. Within days the war with Japan was at a close.

Had these bombs not been dropped and had the invasion been launched as

scheduled, combat casualties in Japan would have been at a minimum of the

tens of thousands. Every foot of Japanese soil would have been paid for by

Japanese and American lives.

One can only guess at how many civilians would have committed suicide in

their homes or in futile mass military attacks. In retrospect, the 1 million

American men who were to be the casualties of the invasion were instead

lucky enough to survive the war.

Intelligence studies and military estimates made 50 years ago, and not

latter-day speculation, clearly indicate that the battle for Japan might

we’ll have resulted in the biggest bloodbath in the history of modern

warfare.

Far worse would be what might have happened to Japan as a nation and as a

culture. When the invasion came, it would have come after several months of

firebombing all of the remaining Japanese cities. The cost in human life

that resulted from the two atomic blasts would be small in comparison to the

total number of Japanese lives that would have been lost by this aerial

devastation.

With American forces locked in combat in the south of Japan, little could

have prevented the Soviet Union from marching into the northern half of the

Japanese home islands. Japan today could be divided much like Korea and

Germany.

The world was spared the cost of Operation Downfall, however, because Japan

formally surrendered to the United Nations September 2, 1945, and World War

II was over.

The aircraft carriers, cruisers and transport ships scheduled to carry the

invasion troops to Japan, ferried home American troops in a gigantic

operation called Magic Carpet. In the fall of 1945, in the aftermath of the

war, few people concerned themselves with the invasion plans. Following the

surrender, the classified documents, maps, diagrams and appendices for

Operation Downfall were packed away in boxes and eventually stored at the

National Archives. These plans that called for the invasion of Japan paint

a vivid description of what might have been one of the most horrible

campaigns in the history of man. The fact that the story of the invasion of

Japan is locked up in the National Archives and is not told in our history

books is something for which all Americans can be thankful.

……………….

The officer that wrote this had the distinct privilege of being assigned as later commander of the 8090th PACUSA detach, 20th AAF, and one of the personal pilots of Brig General Fred Irving USMA 17 when he was commanding general of Western Pacific Base Command. We had a brand-new C-46F tail number 8546. It was different from the rest of the C-46 line in that it was equipped with

Hamilton Hydromantic props whereas the others had Curtis electrics. On one of

the many flights we had 14 Generals and Admirals aboard on an inspection

trip to Saipan and Tinian. Notable aboard was General Thomas C. Handy, who

had signed the operational order to drop the atomic bombs on Japan.

President Truman’s orders were verbal. He never signed an order to drop the

bombs.

On this particular flight, about halfway from Guam to Tinian, a full

Colonel (an aid to General Handy) came up forward and told the officer who wrote this that General Handy would like to come up and look around. He was told him, “he can fly the airplane if he wants to, sir”.

He came up and sat in the copilot’s seat, put on the headset and started

chatting. He was asked him if he ever regretted dropping the bombs. His answer

was, “Certainly not. We saved a million lives on both sides by doing it.. It

was the right thing to do”.

The officer who wrote this never forgot that trip and the honor of being able to talk to General Handy. He was a Lt at the time. A postscript about General Irving; he was one of the finest gentleman he had ever met. He was the oldest living graduate of West Point when he passed on at 100+.

He was one of three Generals who had the honor of being both the “Supe” and

“Com” of West Point. I think the other gentleman were BG Sladen, class of

1890 and BG Stewart, Class of 1896.

I am very happy the invasion never came off because if it had I don’t think

this would be written. We were to provide air support for the boots

on the ground guys. The small arms fire would have been devastating and

lethal as hell to fly through… Just think what it would have been like on

the ground…..

***As was mentioned to many, had Truman not dropped the A-bombs on

Hiroshima & Nagasaki, the officer who wrote this would not be here. Any of you who had fathers serving in the military in 1945 probably wouldn’t be here either. For all of the historical “second guessers” who try to indict America & Truman as

criminals for dropping the bombs, this evidences their ignorance.

Know Your History before you make a judgement

Just in case, some people may want to know about history before attempting to rewrite it.
Here is some food for thought in these troubling times. All of this is fact and is a matter of public record regardless of those many attempts to rewrite history. THE CIVIL WAR WAS NEVER ABOUT SLAVERY. It was a ruse. A ploy. To make the North look better in the court of public opinion. I got an A+++++++ in Mr. Marcus’s 8th grade Social Studies essay contest where he told me it was the best essay he’d ever read. Based on facts. Remember, when it was written, there was no internet. Now although it’s true, I threw that in to be humorous, sort of. My point is if I knew all this since 8th grade, how is it possible that so many people (even learned people) are so clueless? Abe Lincoln was no hero to anyone unless you’re a nationalist that could give a fig about the Constitution.

The Civil War almost happened in 1832. Prior to the Revenue Act of 1861, there was no Federal Income Tax in the US. Prior to that, 90% of federal revenue came from import tariffs. These tariffs varied by goods but averaged 15 to 20%. The European countries that were importing US goods charged a similar tariff rate. Nation to nation this may seem like a fair arrangement, but domestically it was very unbalanced. The bulk of industrial goods, produced in the North, was being consumed within the US. 80% of the agricultural goods produced in the South were being exported. In short, the tariff was forcing the South to charge higher prices for the goods it sold, while, forcing them to pay more for the industrial goods they had to purchase. In the early to mid-1800s, the South only comprised about 30% of the US population, but it was paying about 80% of the revenue that the Federal Government was collecting.

Things came to a head in 1832, the fed enacted two new tariffs and effectively raised the tariff rate to almost 50%. South Carolina responded with a State Convention and articles of nullification. This nearly led to secession and armed conflict. We know it as the “Nullification Crisis”. Fortunately, a compromise came about in 1833 and it reduced the tariff rate to an average of 20%.

In the late 1850s, the US was experiencing a recession. The recession had the most effect on the industrial north. Using the recession as an excuse, in May 1860, the federal government passed the Morrill Tariff. This effectively raised the tariff rate to 50%. This was a highly partisan act. Only one Southern congressional representative, out of 50, voted in favor of the tariff.
South Carolina responded in December by seceding from the union. It quickly followed, in January 1861, by five more Southern states. By June 1861, the eleven primary Southern states had all seceded from the union.

This was the major concern to the northern controlled Union Government. They knew how much they relied upon the South for federal revenue. Conversely, the general populace in the North had an attitude of “let them go”. They didn’t see the significance of the departure of the southern states and also most people recognized the unions’ design for the mutual benefit and also recognized each state had a right to secede.

The southern states considered the matter closed and set upon forming a Confederacy and putting together a government. They had no desire for war and certainly no intention of invading the North. The only point of contention is the fact there were multiple Union Garrisons located in what was now a bordering country. South Carolina demanded the union forces vacate Fort Sumter.

Newly elected Union President Abraham Lincoln, along with the Northern Federal Government saw the situation at Fort Sumter as an opportunity to force the South (South Carolina in particular) into an aggressive act and gain popular support for military efforts to bring the south back into the Union. The entire Union Government was of the opinion the North held an overwhelming advantage over the South, based on population, and industry. An armed conflict through negotiations might resolve itself and lead to the south’s defeat.

President Lincoln informed South Carolina Governor Francis Pickens not only would the Union not surrender Fort Sumter to South Carolina, but they intended instead to resupply the fort. On April 12th, 1861, South Carolina batteries fired on the resupply ships approaching Charleston Harbor and also fired upon Fort Sumter itself. The resulting battle lasted for one day and they surrendered the fort to South Carolina on April 14th. Ironically, no one died on either side, yet the North used this as an excuse to start the bloodiest war in the History of the US resulting in the deaths of over 750,000 combatants and countless civilians.

What Lincoln and the Northern government did not count on was how quickly the South would prepare for full-scale war, nor how strong the resolve of the Southern men to defend their lives, homes, and freedom would be.

The South either won or fought to a stalemate in all the initial battles. Northern sentiment for the war quickly disappeared and Northern men and women questioned why they were sending their husbands, brothers, fathers, and sons, to die in the name of denying the Southern States their right of self-governance.

Needing a scapegoat to regain support for the war, Lincoln latched on to slavery and ended this oppression. His war against the South ultimately did not differ from any other war. There had to be a scapegoat to justify the loss of life and destruction of property. The almighty dollar just didn’t seem to fit the need.

Now, the entire war is blamed on slavery. This is of course incorrect. Prior to the war, not a single slave gained freedom and slavery was alive and well in the North and the South. Slavery simply was not the driving force leading to war. It was the scapegoat that kept the wheels turning.

Here are some facts that are simply that, facts. The Civil War officially started in April 1861 when South Carolina rightly reclaimed its Sovereign Ground. It did not legally end slavery until the Emancipation Proclamation in September 1862. Basically, the war had been raging for almost a year and a half before there was an official freeing of the slaves. What makes this even more ridiculous is the fact the proclamation only freed the slaves if the South continued the war effort, and did not rejoin the union. In effect, if the South had laid down its arms and rejoined the union, then the proclamation would have been void and slavery would have remained legal.

Another very important fact is the Emancipation Proclamation had no effect on slaves held in the Northern states. It only applied to Southern states that continued hostilities. Here is another fact the left likes to ignore. The Civil War ended in April 1865. Slavery did not end in the US until they fully ratified the 13th Amendment in November 1865.

They constantly purported the Civil War to be about slavery, yet slavery was legal in the Union for the entire duration of the war.

On a related note, the Confederate battle flag is often portrayed as being the representation of slavery in the US. This is completely false. The reality is the stars and bars of the Confederacy were very similar to the stars and stripes of the Union. This resulted in much confusion on the battlefield for both sides. The Confederacy adopted the battle flag in October 1861. This was a benefit to both the Confederate and Union forces. War is ugly regardless, but knowing who is the beneficiary to both sides.

Ultimately, slavery began in the US in 1619 and ended in 1865. Ultimately, what that means is the British flag flew over legal slavery here for 157 years. The US flag flew over legal slavery here for 89 years, including the full duration of the US Civil War. The Confederate battle flag flew over slavery in the South for only 3 years and 7 months.

97% of the Southern combatants in the civil war did not take up arms, take life, give their own life up, and watch their families raped and murdered, while their homeland was destroyed, all so the other 3% could continue the institution of slavery.

Also, the Federal Government did not engage in this costly war for the noble cause of defending their fellow man, only to turn around and commit genocide against the Native Americans less than two years later. They murdered the Native Americans because they murdered their Southern brothers. In the name of the almighty dollar. Shared with me by Lewis W. Fleming.

A Crossroad is on the Horizon

We are approaching a crossroad in America

There was a point in America where the watchwords were, “The only good Indian is a dead Indian.” There were many reasons for that. One being, and probably the most paramount of those, was the fact that Indians killed, butchered, and mutilated everyone including women and children. There was hardly a day that went by people found the destruction the Indians left behind them when they raided a ranch, farm, or small town left what.

Most Americans back in that time frame were from European descendants, steeped in the ways of the European culture and the ordinary trains of thought. Back then, the army’s made war on men, not women and children. Men against other men fought wars. The soldiers left the women and children alone.

When the Buffalo became decimated, leaving the tribes that hunted them to starve, few people cared. When the Indians slaughter in wholesale numbers was well on its way, few people cared about that either. The reason was their savagery. When entire tribes struggled with scarcely little to survive on and finally reduced to eating their dogs, people laughed and commented, “It served them right.” That appalls most of us today because our thinking has changed with the times. Back in the days when bands of braves raided, pillaged, and butchered men, women, and children, it was a relief to know those “dead Indians” would hurt no one else.

I see a parallel of the Indians and what their savagery brought to them in numbers that some would consider genocide, and rightly so. We slaughtered them, starved them to death, and cheated. Bacterial warfare succeeded on the Blackfeet we wrapped when infected individuals with smallpox in blankets and when they died from the disease, they wrapped the blankets around healthy Indians. The atrocities were beyond counting they were so many. The hatred for the Indians was such there were few who cared what happened to them. This brings me to the parallel I mentioned.

Other Africans and Arabs brought the blacks in America out of the jungles of Africa. They lived in dirt floor hooches, covered with branches, or animal skins. Their hygiene was despicable. Flies and other insects swarmed around the bodies of the children and adults constantly. The women burned animal dung in their cooking fires. Their birth rates were astronomical because the death rate of newborns was incredibly high.

Yes, they were slaves. Yes, a certain faction brought them in chains to the US on ships. Slave merchants. Yes, although slavery was legal, history has shown us how despicable the trade was. Yes, people unfairly treated those unfortunate souls horribly, and yes, it is a blight on American history, but it was a legal enterprise, and still practiced in the Arab world. Who then is to blame?

Let’s start with the tribesmen who sold their own countrymen into bondage for a profit. Not only did they get rid of their enemies but made a handsome profit at the same time. Who were the principal brokers? It was Arabs then and now. Most of those Arab brokers were Muslims then and now, yet blacks flock to the Muslim religion like flies to honey. Most usually it comes from the prison systems where young blacks become indoctrinated into the world of Allah. Since backs represent around 70% of all jail and prison inmates in the US. One would want to ask why is that? Probably, because Muslims hate Christians, and Jews with a vile hatred they scarcely hide from the rest of us.

The egregious crimes such as indiscriminate looting being committed against white people currently in the US are going to come back to decimate the black population in America. When they burn our cities, small businesses to the ground, and other private property as well, people will strike back. The attacks physically on white people today will have consequences, and when these incredible crimes go unpunished, the white population is going to tire of this nonsense. They will treat the blacks as they did the Indians long ago. They will turn on them with a vengeance and once this retribution begins, there will be no power on earth that will stop it. What the blacks have unleashed onto themselves is the opening of Pandora’s Box. They will release a vengeance much like what happened to the American Indian, and the call that will resound from north to south, and east to west will be, “The only good black is a dead black.”

Those whites who are promoting this violence are going to be hunted down along with the blacks. And it will kill them in numbers that will go down in our history books later as a bloodbath. Few will escape the retribution. The reason the people will hunt them down is that these people encouraging and aiding the blacks don’t believe there are consequences for what they have caused and created. The police will not interfere because Americans will single them out to be the enemy, and they will not help to put a stop to it.

Just my humble opinion of what I see and what I predict will come to pass soon. You cannot piss into the wind or tug on Superman’s cape. You will always lose when you pick a fight with a superior force. Seldom does a continuous evil deed go unpunished for long? Call it what you will but always remember, good will eventually conquer evil.

L Michael Rusin

Decades Before The Civil War, Lincoln Saw An Approaching Storm. Every American Should Read His Warning.

Beyond their brutality, the young lawyer feared these mobs for the lawlessness they embodied — and the idle familiarity with which his fellow Americans seemed to accept these incidents.

FEBRUARY 12, 2021 By Christopher Bedford

To a hall filled with young men on a cold Illinois night in January 1838, Abraham Lincoln delivered his earliest recorded public remarks.

For the 50 years prior, the living rooms, parlors, and public offices of our country had been teeming with the brave Americans who’d fought, struggled, and suffered to create these United States. “Nearly every American,” Lincoln recalled, “had been a participator in some of its scenes.”

But now that generation was dying off. What no invading army could do, time, he lamented, had itself accomplished: “They were a forest of giant oaks; but the all resistless hurricane had swept over them, and left only, here and there, a lonely trunk… to combat, with its mutilated limbs, a few ruder storms, then to sink, and be no more.”

Without their life experience, he realized, he was the first generation of Americans tasked with upholding their fathers’ noble experiment simply by the strength of their own virtues. This, he warned, would be very difficult.

As he looked around him, at both slave states and their northern neighbors, he saw and feared the evil of swelling mobs not merely for their unfortunate victims, but for our national tolerance of their violence and misrule — and the effect this shrugging of shoulders and murmuring of approval or disapproval would have on patriotic and unpatriotic men alike.

The cause did not connect the incidents. A group of gamblers hanged; a mixed-race murderer burned alive; black men suspected of planning insurrection, and then white men suspected of sympathizing, and then simply out-of-state strangers caught in the middle of swelling hate. But beyond their brutality, the young lawyer feared it connected these mobs for the lawlessness they embodied — and the idle familiarity with which his fellow Americans seemed to accept these incidents.

While the 1830s mobs “hang gamblers, or burn murders,” he cautioned, tomorrow’s mobs would hang and burn the innocent — “and thus it goes on, step by step, till all the walls erected for the defense of the persons and property of individuals, trodden down, and disregarded.”

While after January 2021’s Capitol riot we’ve all seen the ruthless efficiency with which our government can crack down on lawlessness, we too saw the summer before, when months of attacks on federal officers, politicians, police, private homes, courthouses, and innocent bystanders met calculated indifference and shrugged excuses for “historic racial injustices.”

This too was well familiar to Lincoln, who knew the mob will go further and spread deeper warning, “by instances of the perpetrators of such acts going unpunished, the lawless in spirit, encouraged to become lawless in practice; and having been used to no restraint, but dread of punishment, they thus become, absolutely unrestrained.”

“On the other hand,” he predicted, “good men, men who love tranquility, who desire to abide by the laws, and enjoy their benefits, who would gladly spill their blood in the defense of their country; seeing their property destroyed; their families insulted, and their lives endangered; their persons injured, and seeing nothing in the prospect that forebodes a change for the better; become tired of, and disgusted with, a Government that offers them no protection; and are not much averse to a change in which they imagine they have nothing to lose.”

Combined, he warned, these opposing feelings come to one terrible conclusion: “the strongest bulwark of any Government, and particularly of those made up like ours, may effectually break down and destroy — I mean the attachment of the People.”

To ensure that the fading “scenes of the revolution are [not] now or ever entirely forgotten,” Lincoln prescribed “in history, we hope, we will read them and recount them, so long as we shall read the Bible.”

Yet today at The Washington Post, New York Times, and at the top of our government, the privileged and ignorant children of our country tell Americans our experiment is tainted, our Revolution was for evil, our Civil War was not enough. They demand reparations through re-education, racist quotas, kneeling subservience, and crude offerings of money. Neither the honored dead of the Revolution nor the lives of 300,000 Yankee boys lying stiff in Southern dust will appease them — they want more than the blood of our countrymen.

To “fortify against” the mob, Lincoln also prescribed an American “political religion” rested on law, order, morality, and reason, yet today’s revolutionaries reside at the very height of our government, inclined to rule toward the same terrible ends the newspapers, college professors and street activists demand. While we all agree the mob’s attack on the Capitol was intolerable, many claims that mobs of Black Lives Matter and Antifa members occupying and burning our cities are less wicked, justified by some imaginary historic cause.

Black separatism, the left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center claimed Thursday, is no longer born of hate, but “out of valid anger against very real historical and systemic oppression.” Lincoln, however, knew “there is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law.”

Just over two decades after his remarks, Lincoln was president. Stunning bravery, as well as characterized his office the very principles he called for in 1838 — “general intelligence, sound morality and, in particular, a reverence for the Constitution and the laws.”

Treading carefully but boldly between Southern sympathizers and abolitionist radicals, the man who in 1838 lamented the passing of our Founding Fathers would as president write the end of their page in history, uniting once and for all the truths espoused in our Declaration of Independence with the laws laid out in our Constitution.

For a century, Southern apologists seeking to strike his place in history for the fantasies they preferred derided and dismissed Lincoln’s story. Today, racists and radicals of different politics derided and dismissed his story, working hard to undo the political religion he cemented, and to strike his place in history for their own preferred fantasies.

Today, we are merely days away from Abraham Lincoln’s 213th birthday, Americans must remember his life, his deeds, his sacrifice, and the lives, deeds, and sacrifices of all who came before and after him in the service of these United States. If we cannot quickly return to the vision, they fought and died for, heed the warnings of 1838, and remember the lessons of our Revolution and Civil War, we are just as sure to lose our country as ever before.

Christopher Bedford is a senior editor at The Federalist, the vice-chairman of Young Americans for Freedom, a board member at the National Journalism Center, and the author of The Art of the Donald.

A Great Letter

I recently came across this letter to the Connecticut State Police. It is a powerful warning to those who would use the law to suppress or infringe on, and consequently make criminals out of ordinarily law-abiding people. It is long, but very well written and read by everyone who believes in freedom and the American way of freedom.

L Michael Rusin

An Open Letter to the Men and Women of the Connecticut State Police: You are NOT the enemy (UNLESS YOU CHOOSE TO BE.)

The following letter was sent via email to members of the Connecticut State Police, Department of Emergency Services, and Public Protection. There are 1,212 email addresses on the list. There were 62 bounce-backs.

15 February 2014

To the men and women of the Connecticut State Police and the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection:

My name is Mike Vanderboegh. Few of you will know who I am or even will have heard of the Three Percent movement that I founded, though we have been denounced on the national stage by that paragon of moral virtue, Bill Clinton. Three Percenters are uncompromising firearm owners who have stated very plainly for years that we will obey no further encroachments on our Second Amendment rights. Some of you, if you read this carelessly, may feel that it is a threat. It is not.

Three Percenters also believe that to take the first shot in a conflict over principle is to surrender the moral high ground to the enemy. We condemn so-called collateral damage and terrorism such as that represented by the Oklahoma City Bombing and the Waco massacre. We are very aware that if you seek to defeat evil it is vital not to become the evil you claim to oppose. Thus, though this letter is certainly intended to deal with an uncomfortable subject, it is not a threat to anyone. However, it is important for everyone to understand that while we promise not to take the first shot over principle, we make no such promise if attacked, whether by common criminals or by the designated representatives of a criminal government grown arrogant and tyrannical and acting out an unconstitutional agenda under color of law.

If we have any model, it is that of the Founding generation. The threat to public order and safety, unfortunately, comes from the current leaders of your state government who unthinkingly determined to victimize hitherto law-abiding citizens with a tyrannical law. They are the ones who first promised violence on the part of the state if your citizens did not comply with their unconstitutional diktat. Now, having made the threat (and placed the bet that you folks of the Connecticut State Police will meekly and obediently carry it out) they can hardly complain that others take them seriously and try by every means, including this letter, to avoid conflict.

Some of you are already working a major case on me, trying to figure out how I may be arrested for violating Conn. P.A. 13-3, which bears the wildly dishonest title of “An Act Concerning Gun Violence Prevention and Children’s Safety.”

(What part of “protecting children” is accomplished by sparking a civil war?) Not only have I personally violated this unconstitutional and tyrannical act by smuggling and by the encouragement of smuggling, defiance, and non-compliance on the part of your state’s citizens, but I have further irritated your wannabe tyrant bosses by sending them standard capacity magazines in my “Toys for Totalitarians” program. I further have annoyed them by pointing out — and seeking more evidence of — the existence of Mike Lawlor’s KGB file (as well as his FBI and CIA counter-intelligence files). In short, I have made myself a nuisance to your bosses in just about every way I could think of. However, their discomfiture reminds me of the wisdom of that great American philosopher of the late 20th Century, Frank Zappa, who said, “Do you love it? Do you hate it? There it is, the way you made it.” Whether you will be able to make a case on me that sticks are, of course, problematic for a number of reasons which I will detail to you in the letter below. I have already done so to your bosses and include the links in this email so that you may easily access them.

But even if you are not working on my case you will want to pay attention to this letter, because tyrannical politicians in your state have been writing checks with their mouths that they expect you to cash with your blood. We have moved, thanks to them, into a very dangerous undiscovered country. Connecticut is now in a state of cold civil war, one that can flash to bloody conflict in an instant if someone, anyone, does something stupid. So please pay attention, for Malloy and Co. have put all your asses on the line and are counting on your supine obedience to the enforcement of their unconstitutional diktat.

I apparently first came to your attention with this speech on the steps of your state capitol on 20 April 2013. It was very well received by the audience but virtually ignored by the lapdog press of your state. If I may, I’d like to quote some of the more salient points of it that involve you.

“An unconstitutional law is void.” It has no effect. So says American Jurisprudence, the standard legal text. And that’s been upheld by centuries of American law. An unconstitutional law is VOID.

Now that is certainly true. But the tricky part is how do we make that point when the local, state, and federal executive and legislative branches as well as the courts are in the hands of the domestic enemies of the Constitution. Everyone who is currently trying to take away your right to arms starts out by saying “I support the 2nd Amendment.” Let me tell you a home truth that we know down in Alabama — Barack Obama supports the 2nd Amendment just about as much as Adolf Hitler appreciated Jewish culture, or Joseph Stalin believed in individual liberty. Believe what politicians do, not what they say. Because the lie is the attendant of every evil. . .

Before this year no one thought that other firearms and related items would ever be banned — but they were, they have been. No one thought that the authorities of your state would pass laws making criminals out of the previously law-abiding — but they did. If they catch you violating their unconstitutional laws, they will — when they please — send armed men to work their will upon you. And people — innocent of any crime save the one these tyrants created — will die resisting them.

You begin to see, perhaps, how you fit into this. YOU are the “armed men” that Malloy and Company will send “to work their will” upon the previously law-abiding. In other words, this law takes men and women who are your natural allies in support of legitimate law enforcement and makes enemies of the state of them, and bully boy political police of you. So, you all have a very real stake in what happens next. But let me continue:

The Founders knew how to answer such tyranny. When Captain John Parker — one of the three percent of American colonists who actively took the field against the King during the Revolution — mustered his Minutemen on Lexington Green, it was in a demonstration of ARMED civil disobedience. . . The colonists knew what to do and they did it, regardless of the risk — regardless of all the King’s ministers and the King’s soldiery. They defied the King. They resisted his edicts. They evaded his laws and they smuggled. Lord above, did they smuggle.

Now we find ourselves in a similar situation. The new King Barack and his minions have determined to disarm us. We must determine to resist them. No one wants a new civil war (except, apparently, the anti-constitutional tyrants who passed these laws and the media toadies who cheer them on) but one is staring us in the face. Let me repeat that, a civil war is staring us in the face. To think otherwise is to whistle past the graveyard of our own history.

We must, if we wish to avoid armed conflict, get this message across to the collectivists who have declared their appetites for our liberty, our property and our lives — WHEN DEMOCRACY TURNS TO TYRANNY, THE ARMED CITIZEN STILL GETS TO VOTE.

Just like King George, such people will not care, nor modify their behavior, by what you say, no matter how loudly or in what numbers you say it. They will only pay attention to what you DO. So, defy them. Resist their laws. Evade them. Smuggle in what they command you not to have. Only by our ACTS will they be impressed. Then, if they mean to have a civil war, they will at least have been informed of the unintended consequences of their tyrannical actions. Again, I say — Defy. Resist. Evade. Smuggle. If you wish to stay free and to pass down that freedom to your children’s children, you can do no less than to become the lawbreakers that they have unconstitutionally made of you. Accept that fact. Embrace it. And resolve to be the very best, most successful lawbreakers you can be.

Well, I guess at least some of my audience that day took my message to heart. As Connecticut newspapers have finally begun reporting — “Untold Thousands Flout Gun Registration Law” — and national commentators are at last noticing, my advice to defy, resist and evade this intolerable act is well on the way. The smuggling, as modest as it is, I can assure is also happening. This law is not only dangerous it is unenforceable by just about any standard you care to judge it by. Let’s just look at the numbers mentioned in the Courant story.

By the end of 2013, state police had received 47,916 applications for assault weapons certificates, Lt. Paul Vance said. An additional 2,100 that were incomplete could still come in.

That 50,000 figures could be as little as 15 percent of the rifles classified as assault weapons owned by Connecticut residents, according to estimates by people in the industry, including the Newtown-based National Shooting Sports Foundation. No one has anything close to definitive figures, but the most conservative estimates place the number of unregistered assault weapons well above 50,000, and perhaps as high as 350,000.

And that means as of Jan. 1, Connecticut has very likely created tens of thousands of newly minted criminals — perhaps 100,000 people, almost certainly at least 20,000 — who have broken no other laws. By owning unregistered guns defined as assault weapons, all of them are committing Class D felonies.

“I honestly thought from my own standpoint that the vast majority would register,” said Sen. Tony Guglielmo, R-Stafford, the ranking GOP senator on the legislature’s public safety committee. “If you pass laws that people have no respect for and they don’t follow them, then you have a real problem.”

This blithering idiot of a state senator is, as I warned Mike Lawlor the other day, extrapolating. It is a very dangerous thing, extrapolation, especially when you are trying to predict the actions of an enemy you made yourself whom you barely recognize let alone understand. I told Lawlor:

You, you silly sod, are extrapolating from your own cowardice. Just because you wouldn’t risk death for your principles, doesn’t mean there aren’t folks who most certainly will. And, not to put too fine a point on it, but folks who are willing to die for their principles are most often willing to kill in righteous self-defense of them as well. You may be ignorant of such people and their ways. You may think that they are insane. But surely even you cannot be so clueless that, insane or not from your point-of-view, such people DO exist and in numbers unknown. This is the undiscovered country that you and your tyrannical ilk have blundered into, like clueless kindergarteners gaily (no pun intended) tap-dancing in a well-marked mine field. The Founders marked the mine field. Is it our fault or yours that you have blithely ignored the warnings? If I were a Connecticut state policeman I would be wondering if the orders of a possible KGB mole throwback were worth the terminal inability to collect my pension. Of course, you may be thinking that you can hide behind that “thin blue line.” Bill Clinton’s rules of engagement say otherwise.

The odds are, and it gives me no particular satisfaction to say it, is that someone is going to get killed over your unconstitutional misadventures in Connecticut. And if not Connecticut, then New York, or Maryland, or California or Colorado. And once the civil war you all apparently seek is kicked off, it would not be — it could not be — confined to one state.

This is not a threat, of course. Not the personal, actionable threat that you may claim. It ranks right along with — no, that’s wrong, IT IS EXACTLY LIKE — an ex-con meeting me in the street and pointing to my neighbor’s house saying, “Tonight I am going to break in there, kill that man, rape his wife and daughters and steal everything that he is, has, or may become.”

I warn him, “If you try to do that, he will kill you first. He may not look like much, but I know him to be vigilant and perfectly capable of blowing your head off.” That is not a threat from me. It is simply good manners. Consider this letter in the same vein. I am trying to save you from yourself.

For, like that common criminal, you have announced by your unconstitutional law and your public statements in favor of its rigorous enforcement that you have a tyrannical appetite for your neighbors’ liberty, property, and lives. It doesn’t take a crystal ball to see that this policy, if carried to your announced conclusion, will not end well for anybody, but especially for you.

Now let’s examine those numbers in the Courant story. You know the size of the Connecticut Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection. Wikipedia tells us that “CSP currently has approximately 1,248 troopers, and is headquartered in Middletown, Connecticut. It is responsible for protecting the Governor of Connecticut, Lieutenant Governor of Connecticut, and their families.” There are but 1,212 email addresses listed on the state website to which this email is going, which presumably includes everyone including secretaries, receptionists, file clerks, technicians, etc. Now, how many shooters for raid parties you may find among that one thousand, two hundred and forty-eight that Wikipedia cites, or whatever number will be on the payroll when something stupid happens, only you know for sure. I’ll let you do the counting. They are daunting odds in any case, and as you will see, they get more daunting as we go down this road that Malloy and Company have arranged for you. (By the way, don’t forget to subtract those on the Green Zone protective details, for your political masters will certainly see their survival as your mission number one.) So, how many folks would your superiors be interested in seeing you work their will upon? And of these, how many will fight regardless of cost?

Let’s assume that there are 100,000 non-compliant owners of military pattern semi-automatic rifles in your state. I think it is a larger number but 100,000 has a nice round ring to it. Let us then apply the rule of three percent to that number — not to the entire population of your state, not even to the number of firearm owners, but just to that much smaller demonstrated number of resistors. That leaves you with at least 3,000 men and women who will shoot you if you try to enforce this intolerable act upon them. Of course, you will have to come prepared to shoot them. That’s a given. They know this. So please understand: THEY. WILL. SHOOT. YOU. (In what they believe is righteous self-defense.)

Now, if any of them follow Bill Clinton’s rules of engagement and utilize the principles of 4th Generation Warfare, after the first shots are fired by your raid parties, they will not be home when you come to call. These people will be targeting, according to the 4GW that many of them learned while serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, the war makers who sent you. This gets back to that “when democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizenry still gets to vote.” One ballot, or bullet, at a time.

This is all hypothetical, of course, based upon the tyrants’ appetites for these hitherto law-abiding citizens’ liberties, property and lives as well as upon your own willingness to enforce their unconstitutional diktat. And here’s where you can do something about it. The first thing you have to realize is that the people you will be targeting do not view you as the enemy. Indeed, you are NOT their enemy, unless you choose to be one.

Again, an unconstitutional law is null and void. Of course, you may if you like cling to the slim fact that a single, black-robed bandit has ruled the Intolerable Act as constitutional in Shew vs. Malloy, but that will not matter to those three percent of the resistors — your fellow citizens — whom you target. They no longer expect a fair trial in your state in any case, which leaves them, if they wish to defend their liberty, property, and lives, only the recourse of an unfair firefight. So to cite Shew vs. Malloy at the point of a state-issued firearm to such people is, well, betting your life on a very slender reed.

Thus, my kindly advise to you, just as it was to Lawlor, is to not go down that road. You are not the enemy of the people of Connecticut, not yet. The politicians who jammed this law down the peoples’ throats are plainly flummoxed by the resistance it has engendered. In the absence of a definitive U.S. Supreme Court decision do you really want to risk not being able to draw your pension over some politician’s insatiable appetite for power?

There are many ways you can refuse to get caught up in this. Passive resistance, looking the other way, up to and including outright refusal to execute what is a tyrannical law that a higher court may yet find unconstitutional and therefore null and void. Do you really want to have to kill someone enforcing THAT? Just because you were ordered to do so. After Nuremberg, that defense no longer obtains. (You may say, “Well, I’m just a secretary, a clerk, you can’t blame me for anything.” Kindly recall from Nuremberg one other lesson: raid parties cannot break down doors unless someone like you prepares the list in advance.

 In fact, you have at your keyboard and in your databases more raw, naked power than any kick-in-the-door trooper. And with that power comes moral responsibility. Adolf Eichmann didn’t personally kill anyone. But he darn sure made up the lists and saw to it that trains ran on time. When the first Connecticut citizen (or, God forbid, his family) is killed as a result of your list-making, do you think that because you didn’t pull the trigger that gives you a moral pass?).

So, I call on you all, in your own best interest and that of your state, to refuse to enforce this unconstitutional law. There are a number of Three Percenters within the Connecticut state government, especially its law enforcement arms. I know that there have been many discussions around water-coolers and off state premises about the dangers that this puts CT law enforcement officers in and what officers should do if ordered to execute raids on the previously law-abiding.

You have it within your power to refuse to initiate hostilities in an American civil war that would, by its very nature, be ghastly beyond belief and would unleash hatreds and passions that would take generations to get over, if then.

Please, I beg you to understand, you are not the enemy, you are not an occupying force — unless you choose to violate the oath that each of you swore to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States against ALL enemies, foreign and domestic. For their part, the men and women who will be targeted by your raids took an identical oath. Can you think of anything more tragic than brother killing brother over some politician’s tyrannical appetite?

I can’t. The future — yours, mine, our children’s, that of the citizens of Connecticut and indeed of the entire country — is in YOUR hands.

At the very least, by your refusal you can give the courts time to work before proceeding into an unnecessary civil war against your own friends and neighbors on the orders of a self-anointed elite who frankly don’t give a shit about you, your life, your future, or that of your family. They wouldn’t pass these laws if they thought that they would have to risk the potential bullet that their actions have put you in the path of. They count on you to take that bullet, in service of their power and their lies. Fool them. Just say no to tyranny. You are not the enemy. Don’t act like one.

Sincerely,

Mike Vanderboegh

The alleged leader of a merry band of Three Percenters

PO Box 926

Pinson AL 35126

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”

John F. Kennedy, In a speech at the White House, 1962

35th president of US 1961-1963 (1917 – 1963)

CHICAGO HUMOR

I was driving through northern Illinois last night, listening to a call-in program on WGN in Chicago. People were calling in all upset about the goat’s head, sent to Cubs owner Tom Ricketts at Wrigley Field because of the team’s poor performance. Some guy called in from Lake Geneva, Wisconsin and said, “Why are you all so upset cause someone sent a goat’s head to Wrigley Field? Aren’t you the guys that sent a horse’s ass to the White House?” I almost ran off the road!

Another Blonde Joke

A gorgeous young redhead goes into the doctor’s office and said that her body hurt wherever she touched it.’Impossible!’ says the doctor.. ‘Show me.’ The redhead took her finger, pushed on her left shoulder and screamed, then she pushed her elbow and screamed even more. She pushed her knee and screamed; likewise she pushed her ankle and screamed. Everywhere she touched made her scream. The doctor said, ‘You’re not really a redhead, are you? ‘Well, no’ she said, ‘I’m actually a blonde. ”I thought so,’ the doctor said, ‘Your finger is broken.’